Network Governance pada Program Tagana Masuk Sekolah Dalam Menghadapi Bencana Alam di Kabupaten Kolaka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69616/pb.v1i1.257Keywords:
disaster mitigation, network governance, tagana programAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out and describe Network Governance in the Implementation of the Taruna Siaga Bencana (TAGANA) Program Entering Schools in Facing Natural Disasters in Kolaka Regency. The method used in this research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The location of this research is at the Social Service, TAGANA Headquarters, and schools that have received counseling on this program. The informants in this study are TAGANA Coordination from the Social Service, TAGANA Coordinator, TAGANA Secretary, TAGANA Members, and School Teachers. The type and source of data in this research are primary data and secondary data. The research results show that the implementation of network governance in the TAGANA Program Entering Schools in Kolaka Regency involves several actors, including the Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology, Social Service, TAGANA, and school parties including teachers and students as beneficiaries. However, coordination between the Social Service, TAGANA, and schools is not yet optimal, this is due to many schools rejecting the program on the grounds that the entire budget must be borne by the school, while the budget has actually been prepared by the social service. Lack of good communication causes miscommunication between actors. The factors that cause this program to be minimally implemented are as follows: first, region: not all schools can be reached due to geographical factors and different disaster paths, second, human resources: the number of TAGANA members is 52 people, but only 4-5 people can conduct socialization about disaster mitigation, third, budget: available funds must be divided with other programs such as disaster-prone village programs, TAGANA operations, public kitchens, and so on. Fourth, time: many tasks of TAGANA and other social services so that this program is neglected.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655431
Nurhidayah, R., Herry, W., & Purwadinata, S. (2022). Membangun Komunitas Dalam Pengembangan Masyarakat (Samarinda). PT. Gaptek Media Pustaka.
Sabaruddin, A., & Said, A. L. (2020). Colaborative Governance: Pendekatan Pelayanan Publik. CV. Pena Persada.
Saputra, L. O. M. D. (2023). Banjir melanda 13 desa dan kelurahan di Kolaka. Antara. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3619596/banjir-melanda-13-desa-dan-kelurahan-di-kolaka
Tanjung, R. S., Sikumbang, A. T., & Winda Kustiawan. (2023). Strategi Komunikasi Taruna Siaga Bencana Dalam Mensosialisasikan Urgensi Mitigasi Bencana di Kota Medan. JURNAL SIMBOLIKA Research and Learning in Communication Study, 8(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.31289/simbolika.v8i2.7163
Taufan Maulana, A., & Andriansyah, A. (2024). Mitigasi Bencana di Indonesia. COMSERVA?: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(10), 3996–4012. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i10.1213
